While upholding the conviction, a bench comprising CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar set aside the life imprisonment imposed on the convict by the Allahabad High Court
Representational pic
The Supreme Court on Thursday accepted a report concluding that a man convicted by the Allahabad High Court was a minor when he raped and murdered a 10-year-old girl in 2013 in Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, and allowed him to walk free, news agency PTI reported
ADVERTISEMENT
While upholding the conviction, a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar set aside the life imprisonment imposed on the convict by the Allahabad High Court.
On May 17, 2018, a trial court had awarded the man death penalty in the case, PTI reported.
The case was then referred to Allahabad High Court for confirmation of the capital punishment as mandated under the code of criminal procedure.
The Lucknow bench of the high court, however, commuted the death penalty to life imprisonment without the reprieve of remission, PTI reported.
While taking note of the appeals, the top court had asked the Juvenile Justice Board at Faizabad to conduct due verification of the age of the accused and submit a report on the claim of juvenility.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court bench perused the report, which showed that the convict was born on July 5, 1995, and was under 18 years of age on the date of the crime, January 1, 2013.
"We may note that the counsel for the state of Uttar Pradesh does not contest the report given by the JJB. We have also examined the said report and the reasons given therein and do not find any good ground and reason to take a different view. The appellant, X, is accordingly directed to be treated as a juvenile on the date of the occurrence/commission of offence," the bench held.
The accused spent more than a decade in jail before his release was ordered by the Supreme Court.
"Accordingly, the conviction of the appellant, X, is upheld but the sentence imposed on him, treating him as an adult as on the date of the occurrence/commission of the offence, is treated as cancelled/waived. The appellant, X, is directed to be released in accordance with law, if not warranted to be detained in any other matter," the bench ordered.
The girl did not reach home after going to school. Her body was discovered in the evening in a sugarcane field, with a scarf wrapped around her neck.
A first information report (FIR) was lodged by her uncle and investigations led to the appellant's arrest.
While upholding the conviction, the Allahabad High Court evaluated whether the crime met the "rarest of the rare" threshold required to impose the death penalty.
The bench observed that while life imprisonment was the rule, death sentence was an exception.
Circumstances of both the crime and the offender must be weighed, the high court said, adding that though the crime was heinous, death penalty was not warranted in this case.
(With PTI inputs)
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
