shot-button
Holi Holi
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai Crime News > Article > Aurangzeb remark case Mumbai court cautions Abu Azmi to exercise restraint during interviews

Aurangzeb remark case: Mumbai court cautions Abu Azmi to exercise restraint during interviews

Updated on: 13 March,2025 04:04 PM IST  |  Mumbai
mid-day online correspondent |

Additional Sessions Judge V G Raghuwanshi schooled Abu Azmi while granting him anticipatory bail on Tuesday in a case filed against the SP legislator for his remarks praising Mughal ruler Aurangzeb

Aurangzeb remark case: Mumbai court cautions Abu Azmi to exercise restraint during interviews

Abu Azmi (above) was suspended from the Maharashtra legislative assembly till March 26. File Pic

Listen to this article
Aurangzeb remark case: Mumbai court cautions Abu Azmi to exercise restraint during interviews
x
00:00

Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi has been cautioned by a Mumbai court to exercise restraint during interviews as any 'irresponsible' statement by a senior politician like him can spark riots, reported the PTI.


Additional Sessions Judge V G Raghuwanshi schooled Abu Azmi while granting him anticipatory bail on Tuesday in a case filed against the SP legislator for his remarks praising Mughal ruler Aurangzeb, according to the PTI.


The offence concerns some statements made during an interview and it means police do not need custody for seizure of any article or interrogation, the court said in the order, a copy of which was made available on Thursday.


Noting that Abu Azmi is a politician and businessman and it was improbable that he would run away from the course of justice, the judge said it was a 'fit case to exercise discretion' in his favour.

"Before parting with the order I would like to caution the applicant (Azmi) to exercise restraint on himself while giving interviews, having regards to prevailing circumstances. Any irresponsible statement can flare riots and create law and order problems," the court said, the news agency reported.

"I hope the applicant, being a senior politician, will understand his responsibility," it added.

The case was registered last week against the MLA, who represents the Mankhurd-Shivaji Nagar constituency in the metropolis, under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) over his remarks eulogising the medieval-era Mughal emperor.

He was booked under BNS sections 299 (deliberate and malicious act insulting the religious beliefs of any group of people), 302 (hurting someone's religious feelings) and 356(2) (defamation).

Abu Azmi, who is also the Samajwadi Party's Maharashtra unit president, had said while talking to the media that during Aurangzeb's reign, India's borders reached Afghanistan and Burma (Myanmar).

"Our GDP (gross domestic product) accounted for 24 per cent (of world GDP) and India was called a golden sparrow," the opposition legislator had claimed.

Asked about the fight between Aurangzeb and Maratha warrior king Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, Azmi had termed it a political battle.

The remarks were made in the backdrop of the blockbuster Hindi film 'Chhaava', based on the life of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, who was captured by Aurangzeb's commander in 1689. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj and his father, legendary Maratha king Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, are highly revered figures in Maharashtra.

Seeking anticipatory bail, Azmi, who has been suspended from the Maharashtra legislative assembly till March 26, submitted in the court that his statements were made to the press 'spontaneously without any premeditated intention to insult any personality or hurt the religious feelings of any person', reported the PTI.

Azmi's lawyer Mubin Solkar had submitted before the court that the FIR did not disclose any offence against the SP legislator.

"The allegations didn't show he had made the statements, deliberately and with malicious intentions of outraging religious sentiments," Solkar had argued.

The prosecution had opposed his plea, saying that after the release of a movie, religious sentiments of people are volatile and in such circumstances the applicant made controversial statements in his interview.

After hearing both sides, the court said that the investigation was at the primary stage and 'therefore it will not be fair to comment upon the interview given by the applicant'.

Further, the judge said that he was surprised to hear that the investigating officer did not have the video recording of the alleged interview till ¿today¿ and he registered an offence without watching it.

(with PTI inputs)

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK