shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > Entertainment News > Bollywood News > Article > HC seeks Salman Khans reply on Kamaal R Khans plea against order restraining him from commenting on actor

HC seeks Salman Khan's reply on Kamaal R Khan's plea against order restraining him from commenting on actor

Updated on: 16 September,2021 12:00 AM IST  |  Mumbai
ANI |

Kamaal R Khan in his plea said a film viewer cannot be prohibited from making comments about a film or its characters

HC seeks Salman Khan's reply on Kamaal R Khan's plea against order restraining him from commenting on actor

Salman Khan Picture Courtesy: Mid-day Archives

The Bombay High Court has issued a notice to Bollywood actor Salman Khan, seeking his reply on self-proclaimed film critic Kamaal R Khan's plea urging for quashing a lower court's interim order restraining him from making any comments on the actor, his movies, or his companies. Kamaal R Khan in his plea said a film viewer cannot be prohibited from making comments about a film or its characters.


He further said the lower court should not have passed such a blanket order, and while the court could restrain him from making personal comments against Salman Khan, it could not prohibit fair criticism of the latter's movies. On Thursday, a single bench presided over by Justice A S Gadkari issued notices to Salman Khan, his production company Salman Khan Ventures, and several social media intermediaries seeking their response to Kamaal Khan's plea.


Kamaal Khan has challenged a Mumbai court's interim order issued in June this year on a defamation suit filed by Salman Khan against the former over his comments on the film "Radhe" and some of his other videos and commentary. The court at that time restrained Kamaal Khan from posting or publishing any defamatory content about Salman Khan, his business ventures and/or films, his family members, until the final order in the defamation case.


However, in his appeal filed in the HC filed through advocate Manoj Gadkari, Kamaal Khan claimed the lower court's interim order is no less than a "gag order".
He said he is a film critic and had fairly criticised the film "Radhe" in which Salman Khan, "who is a 55-year-old, was acting like a teenager". The petitioner also claimed the lower court's injunction was breaching his fundamental right to practice his trade -- that of a film critic, and thus, preventing him from earning his rightful livelihood.

He said in his appeal that he had not made any comments or posted videos and tweets with the intention of defaming Salman Khan or his films.
"The lower court should not have failed to keep in mind that a viewer of a film cannot be stopped from making any comments on the film or the characters in the film, or whether the actors in the film are hit or flop," he said in his petition. He also claimed in his appeal that the lower court had committed a "gross error" in passing the injunction order, and that such order was "illegal".

The counsels for Salman Khan and some other respondents told the HC that they received the copies of Kamaal Khan's appeal late Wednesday night, and sought time to take instructions from their clients. The HC will hear the plea further after two weeks. 

Also Read: Salman Khan seeks contempt action against KRK for defamation

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK