shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > News > India News > Article > Gyanvapi row HC orders Varanasi court to decide plea seeking unrestricted right to worship shivling

Gyanvapi row: HC orders Varanasi court to decide plea seeking unrestricted right to worship 'shivling'

Updated on: 04 March,2024 09:32 PM IST  |  Prayagraj
PTI |

Allahabad High Court has directed a Varanasi court to decide within eight weeks an application seeking unrestricted right to worship a 'shivling' purportedly found inside the Gyanvapi mosque premises in May 2022

Gyanvapi row: HC orders Varanasi court to decide plea seeking unrestricted right to worship 'shivling'

Gyanvapi mosque. File pic/PTI

The Allahabad High Court has directed a Varanasi court to decide within eight weeks an application seeking unrestricted right to worship a 'shivling' purportedly found inside the Gyanvapi mosque premises in May 2022.


On May 16, 2022, during a court-ordered survey of the Gyanvapi premises adjacent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi, a structure found in the wazukhana area was claimed to be a 'shivling' by the Hindu side and a 'fountain' by the Muslim side.


Justice Manish Kumar Nigam passed the order on a plea filed by Vivek Soni and another person who had approached the high court requesting speedy disposal of their interim application pending before the civil judge (senior division) in Varanasi since 2022.


The application has been moved during pendency of the suit seeking a permanent injunction against the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid restraining it to interfere in the worship of the alleged 'shivling'.

In the suit filed in 2022, plaintiffs have sought a permanent injunction against the mosque committee and others to prevent any interference in the offering of prayers to the alleged 'shivling'.

While disposing of the plea, the high court in its order dated February 27 observed, "Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Varanasi to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment." 

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK