shot-button
E-paper E-paper
Home > News > India News > Article > Cant use language like Tom Dick Harry in petition Delhi High Court

Can't use language like 'Tom, Dick, Harry' in petition: Delhi High Court

Updated on: 03 March,2021 10:34 AM IST  |  New Delhi
PTI |

Justice Prathiba M Singh said the petitioner appeared to have drafted the petition on his own and perusal of a paragraph showed that “there is slang language being used in the petition”

Can't use language like 'Tom, Dick, Harry' in petition: Delhi High Court

Photo for representational purpose

The Delhi High Court has expressed displeasure over usage of sentence like “Tom, Dick and Harry” in a petition raising grievance relating to National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and said such “slang language” is not permissible in the pleadings before a court of law.


The high court, which declined to entertain the petition, said it was refraining from imposing costs at this stage since the petitioner was appearing in person.


Justice Prathiba M Singh said the petitioner appeared to have drafted the petition on his own and perusal of a paragraph showed that “there is slang language being used in the petition”.


“The said paragraph reads as under: '(f) The AA / NCLT cannot permit any person - Tom, Dick, and Harry to represent and defend the respondent under section of IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code), as the rules does not permit it.' Such language is not permissible in pleadings before the court. Accordingly, this petition is liable to be dismissed,” Justice Singh said.

The petitioner, in his plea, has raised a grievance against the NCLT and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) alleging that wrong procedures are being adopted by the said tribunals.

The high court said if the petitioner was aggrieved by any order of the NCLT or NCLAT, he may draft a proper petition and only then file the same.

“At this stage, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail of his remedies in accordance with law. Since the petitioner is appearing in person, this court is refraining from imposing costs at this stage,” the court said.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK