01 November,2024 11:35 AM IST | Mumbai | Srijanee Majumdar
New Zealand`s Mitchell Santner (2R) is congratulated by India`s head coach Gautam Gambhir (R) for their team`s win at the end of the third day of the second Test. Pic/AFP
Subscribe to Mid-day GOLD
Already a member? Login
Gautam Gambhir's recent remarks about the current state of Indian batting in Test cricket read like a scathing indictment of the effects of T20 cricket on the traditional format.
As India prepare for their final match against New Zealand at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium, Gambhir's critique highlights a profound shift in the mindset of modern cricketers, one that seems to prioritise flamboyance over the foundational virtues of patience and defense.
Let us not mince words: the Indian batting lineup, once revered for its artistry and resilience, has devolved into a collection of players seemingly more attuned to hitting sixes than grinding out runs.
The series against New Zealand has been nothing short of a nightmare for the hosts, culminating in an astonishing 46 all out in the first innings of the first Test. Such a score is hardly the stuff of champions, especially for a team that has long basked in the glory of its batting prowess.
ALSO READ
Umpires step in after Sarfaraz Khan's relentless sledging, Rohit Sharma responds
Tensions rise as Rohit, Mitchell spar over Sarfaraz, Pant's provocative actions
New Zealand reach 92 for three against India at lunch on Day 1
Could Rishabh Pant be the next star in CSK's yellow? Suresh Raina thinks so
Training takes precedence as BCCI scraps India's intra squad warm-up game
Gambhir's observation about the influence of the T20 format is spot on. It is as if the players have taken a crash course in swinging for the fences, forgetting entirely that Test cricket is about attrition, concentration, and a steely resolve to defend one's wicket.
And let's not ignore the reality: New Zealand has waltzed into Indian territory and, shockingly, managed to claim their first-ever Test series victory on Indian soil. It's a feat that, just a few years ago, would have been laughed off as a pipe dream.
Yet here we are, with the Black Caps on the verge of a clean sweep, and Indian batsmen floundering under the pressure. The irony is delicious, a team known for its spin prowess has succumbed to spin itself, as Mitchell Santner's bowling has left the Indian lineup looking like deer caught in headlights.
Also Read: Gambhir's India in a tailspin
Gambhir on Thursday was quick to dismiss claims that the Indian batsmen had lost their ability to combat spin. "I don't think so, sometimes you got to give it to the opposition as well," he told reporters. "Mitchell Santner was outstanding in the last game but we will keep working hard, we will keep getting better. I don't think so our skill against spin has gone down." He pointed out that the issue lies not in their technical skills but in their mindset - a mindset that has been corrupted by the fast-paced, high-scoring nature of T20 cricket. Indian batters seem to have taken the notion of âplay your natural game' a little too seriously, interpreting it as a license to throw caution to the wind.
The second Test loss, which wrapped up in less than three days, sent shockwaves through a nation that had grown accustomed to home victories. It marked the end of a glorious 18-series winning streak at home, a statistic that, in itself, is a testament to the prowess of Indian cricket.
As India gear up for the final Test, one can only hope that the players find a way to recalibrate their approach. There is the World Test Championship looming and the arduous tour of Australia that begins with five Tests in Perth. The time for recklessness has passed; the focus must now shift to rebuilding the confidence and mindset necessary to thrive in the longer format of the game.
"Every time you lose a game, be it at home or be it away from home, it should hurt. That hurt will make us better," he said. "For me, it's good that World Test Championship points are important and there are no dead rubbers any more in Test cricket. We should try and win this Test match so that we go to Australia with a win under our belt."
Gambhir's resolve that the team will not âgift' New Zealand a clean sweep is admirable, yet the question remains: can they truly turn the tide? Will they revert to a more conservative approach that values defense and resilience over a whirlwind of aggressive strokes? The final Test represents not just an opportunity to salvage pride but a chance to reassess their identity as Test cricketers.
As India grapple with the dual pressures of entertainment and efficacy, one can only hope they will remember that cricket, at its core, is as much about survival as it is about scoring. The legacy of Indian cricket deserves more than just flamboyant displays; it deserves players who can stand their ground, defend their wickets, and play the long game.