11 December,2018 08:15 PM IST | New Delhi | IANS
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the CBI to investigate the murders of activists Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare, M.M. Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh if it found a "common thread" in the crimes.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is already investigating the Dabholkar murder case.
As the investigating agency wanted some time to look into the matter, a Bench of Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Navin Sinha gave the agency time till the first week of January to come back with its response.
The court asked the CBI if there was any common link in the murders of the activists. It raised the question while hearing a plea by Umadevi Mallinath Kalburgi, the widow of M.M. Kalburgi, who is seeking a SIT probe into his murder.
ALSO READ
Supreme Court allows multibillion-dollar class action to proceed against Meta
Important matters heard by Supreme Court on Nov 22
Supreme Court to rule on removal of 'Secular' and 'Socialist' from Constitution
Supreme Court stresses on tree census in Taj Trapezium Zone
Supreme Court may set up committees in states to monitor firearms
On November 26, while hearing Umadevi's plea, the apex court had pulled up the Karnataka Police for not doing anything to probe the murder of Kalburgi, who was shot dead outside his house in Dharwad on August 30, 2015.
"What have you done so far? You are just fooling around," the Bench of Justice Fali Nariman and Justice Navin Sinha had said, as it asked the state police to spell out how much time it would require to complete the investigation.
Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever