15 September,2022 04:34 PM IST | Mumbai | PTI
Representational Pic
There is no social stigma attached to the word 'anaath' that means orphan and hence there is no need to change it at all, the Bombay High Court said on Thursday while dismissing a public interest litigation (PIL).
A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Madhav Jamdar was hearing the PIL filed by NGO Swanath Foundation seeking for the word 'anaath' to be changed to 'swanath'.
The plea claimed that children who have lost their parents already face a vulnerable situation and the word 'anaath' reflects as a needy, helpless and deprived child.
The word 'swanath' would mean a self reliant and confident child.
ALSO READ
Advocate pursuing MPhil alleges MU's law dept tampered with his answer sheets
Bomaby HC upholds tender awarded to Adani Group for Dharavi slum project
Bombay HC dismisses plea against Sena leader Ravindra Waikar's win in LS polls
Mumbai: Hawkers ply wares right next to BMC van
Badlapur sexual assault case probe complete; cop suspended: SIT to HC
The bench, however, said that this was not a case where the court ought to intervene. "Sometimes we, too, have to draw a 'lakshman rekha' and not intervene in every matter," C J Datta said.
Also Read: Maharashtra govt should take decision on providing office to MAT: Bombay HC
"The word 'anaath' is in use since ages. We do not agree with the petitioner that the word 'anaath' that is used to refer to those children who have lost their parents attaches any social stigma. There is no need for a change at all," the court said and dismissed the PIL.
The bench further noted that the petitioner wants the word to be changed to 'Swanath' which is the name of the NGO.
"What is the social stigma in the word 'anaath'? The English word is orphan and across many languages like Hindi, Marathi and Bengali the synonym is 'anaath'. Who is the petitioner to now say change the word? What does he know about linguistics?" the court asked.
The petitioner's advocate Uday Warunjikar said a better word should be used while referring to such children. The bench, however, refused.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever