02 September,2024 05:24 PM IST | Paris | AFP
Olympic rings adorning the Eiffel Tower in Paris (Pic: AFP)
Plans by Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo to keep the Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower have been condemned by designer Gustave Eiffel's descendants and provoked a backlash from some Parisians.
The giant rings were a popular addition to the monument for visitors and tourists in Paris during the July 28-August 11 Olympic Games in the French capital.
Hidalgo announced on Saturday that she intended to take down the originals, which are too heavy to remain on the monument, and replace them with new rings.
"It does not seem appropriate to us that the Eiffel Tower, which has become the symbol of Paris and the whole of France since its construction 135 years ago, has the symbol of an outside organisation added to it in a permanent way, whatever its prestige," a statement from the Association of Gustave Eiffel's Descendants said.
ALSO READ
Kerry foresees series of executive orders by Trump, hopes pulling out of Paris Agreement isn't one
Kerry foresees series of executive orders by Trump admin, hopes pulling out of Paris Agreement isn't one
COP29 adopts establishment of global carbon market under Paris Agreement's Article 6
Paris to deploy 4,000 police officers for France-Israel soccer match following violence in Amsterdam
Paris to deploy 4,000 police officers for France-Israel soccer match following violence in Amsterdam
The association's chairman Olivier Berthelot-Eiffel, a great-great-grandson of Eiffel, told AFP the family did not see any problem with the rings staying longer than the Paralympic Games which wrap up on September 8.
"But the Eiffel Tower should not become an advertising outpost. Anne Hidalgo should have said that she wanted to keep the Olympic rings, not that she had decided it, and then discussed the idea with the Paris council and relevant individuals," he explained.
Culture Minister Rachida Dati, a long-time critic and opponent of Hidalgo, also cast doubt over the idea, saying the Socialist city leader would need to follow procedures protecting historic buildings.
"The Eiffel Tower is a protected monument, the work of an immense engineer and designer," Dati said in a statement.
"Protections for its architectural merit and his work require authorisations and an impact study before any major modifications can be carried out, in line with the law on protected buildings," she added.
'A mistake'
Reaction on social media was mixed, but many Parisians appeared highly dubious about modifying the symbol of the city that is also a protected UNESCO world heritage site.
"The Eiffel Tower has a history of 135 years and surpasses a sports and media event of 17 days," commented the SOS Paris group, which campaigns to protect Paris's landmarks and historic character.
"For me, this is a mistake," Paris MP Sylvain Maillard, from President Emmanuel Macron's centrist party, told France Bleu Paris radio.
"The Games were a very powerful moment, but the Eiffel Tower embodies something timeless."
Hidalgo told the Ouest-France newspaper on Saturday that she wanted to keep the rings and "the decision is up to me and I have the agreement of the IOC (International Olympic Committee)."
Also Read: Olympic rings to stay at Eiffel Tower after Paris Paralympics 2024: Paris mayor
The Eiffel Tower was unveiled in 1889 for the World Fair in the French capital. Reviled by some Parisians at the time, the 324-metre (1,063-foot) tower of latticed steel girders was originally built as a temporary attraction to showcase French construction prowess but became a working telecoms tower, used for radio and TV transmissions. The "Iron Lady" has since become the capital's symbol and is one of the world's top tourist attractions, with 6.3 million visitors in 2023.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever