The Bombay High Court, in its order, has stated that a person can have beef in Maharashtra, provided it has been purchased from neighbouring state, where it is not banned. Here’s how Twitterati reacted
The Bombay High Court, in its order, has stated that a person can have beef in Maharashtra, provided it has been purchased from neighbouring state, where it is not banned. Here’s how Twitterati reacted to the development.
ADVERTISEMENT
So you can't slaughter a cow in Maharashtra, but you can do it outside and eat it here? And no one finds this hypocritical or absurd? #beef
— lindsay pereira (@lindsaypereira) May 6, 2016
So, the slaughter of cows in other states does not hurt the religious sentiments of anyone in Maharashtra. Cool! #beef
— Yashnashree (@tinker_toes) May 6, 2016
Lucky to be in Tamilnadu, Just had #beef gravy. Sorry Maharashtra, No water is not a problem, #beef is really a problem.
— த | மி | à®´à¯u00c2u008d ® (@THEJOHNDANIELL) May 6, 2016
It's bizarre. You can have possession but you can't slaughter a cow and eat? Does it even make sense? #beef #beefban https://t.co/7iY3xUehAu
— Mrs. Tony Stark :D (@BrushUrTeeth_03) May 6, 2016
Ridiculous decision by #BombayHC that outside #beef allowed. In such case outside liquor must b allowed in gujrat bihar like dry states
— shubham kajwe (@shubhamkajwe) May 6, 2016
Absurd Judiciary Logic !!
— राठà¥u00c2u008cर à¤u00c2u0085निरà¥u00c2u0082दà¥u00c2u008dधसिà¤u00c2u0082ह ® (@Anirudh_SR) May 6, 2016
Slaughtering for Beef is illegal but bringing #beef from outside Maharashtra is allowed.!https://t.co/Jzb33jzPkp