shot-button
Maharashtra Elections 2024 Maharashtra Elections 2024
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Mumbai PMLA court rejects plea seeking blanket bail to all MVA MPs MLAs

Mumbai: PMLA court rejects plea seeking blanket bail to all MVA MPs, MLAs

Updated on: 22 July,2022 06:25 PM IST  |  Mumbai
PTI |

The Maha Vikas Aghadi comprises the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena, the Congress and Nationalist Congress Party, and was in power in Maharashtra till June 29

Mumbai: PMLA court rejects plea seeking blanket bail to all MVA MPs, MLAs

Representative image. Pic/Istock

A special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Mumbai on Friday rejected a plea seeking blanket anticipatory bail for all MPs and MLAs of the Maha Vikas Aghadi as "not maintainable", with the court also stating that such an order would set a "bad tradition".


The Maha Vikas Aghadi comprises the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena, the Congress and Nationalist Congress Party, and was in power in Maharashtra till June 29.


The petition, which was filed in June by Congress workers Madhu Holamagi, Yusuf Patel and Ranjeet Dutta, claimed the Centre was misusing probe agencies to target MVA constituents with the intention of supressing the (then) state government.


Though the court had sought a response from the Enforcement Directorate, the probe agency didn't appear or file a reply opposing the plea.

Also Read: MVA allies should contest 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections together, says Sharad Pawar

Special PMLA Judge MG Deshpande, in his order, said a very astonishing and peculiar situation was being made in this application.

Throughout the application, there is not a whisper that these three applicants are apprehending their arrest, and on this count itself the application is not maintainable and deserves to be rejected, the court said.

Regarding MPs and MLAs of the MVA, there is nothing like a resolution signed by them appointing these three applicants to file an anticipatory bail application on their (legislators) behalf, the court added.

The order also said there was absolutely no strong prima-facie case being made out by the applicants for grant of any relief, either interim or final.

"Applicants are not apprehending their arrest. They are praying for interim protection to third parties. Passing such a blanket order will set a bad tradition. Basically I hold that the application itself is not maintainable," Judge Deshpande said.

In the plea, the three petitioners had referred to the arrests of former state ministers Anil Deshmukh and Nawab Malik in cases being probed by Central agencies.

The court said these "cannot be a part of this application as another special court has already dealt with the same".

Similarly, summons issued for questioning to Congress chief Sonia Gandhi was by the Enforcement Directorate, Delhi and the same is under the territorial jurisdiction of PMLA Special Court, Delhi, the court said.

"Therefore, much discussion is not necessary. Making such allegations and grounds herein is baseless and the same deserves to be rejected," the court said.

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK